Strategy

Where does AI earn its place in ecommerce?

Assess AI in ecommerce through contribution, customer experience and trading decisions, with practical ways to test value, sequence work and assign ownership.

AI earns its place in ecommerce when it improves a commercial decision or customer outcome enough to justify the work and cost of operating it. Start with a problem in the buying journey, trading process or operation, then assess its effect on contribution, service and team capacity.

More orders, faster content production and fewer minutes spent on a task are useful signals. The decision to invest needs to account for what happens after the sale and after the first implementation. The examples below illustrate decisions an ecommerce team might face.

Agree what commercial value means

Choose a measure with the people responsible for trading and finance. For the decision under review, account for discounts, product costs, returns, fulfilment, payment costs and customer service. Include any additional acquisition cost and the cost of running the proposed solution. Agree how shared costs and timing will be handled so the comparison remains consistent.

For example, a recommendation experience could encourage customers to add another item while also increasing shipping subsidies, picking effort and returns. Assess the completed order and its contribution before treating a larger basket as a success.

Likewise, AI-assisted product content could make publishing faster while requiring more checking or creating avoidable service contacts. Include preparation, review and correction in the cost of the work.

Separate recurring operating costs from initial investment. The business needs to understand both the ongoing economics and what evidence would justify recovering the implementation cost. A projected benefit should remain an assumption until measured.

Find the customer decision worth improving

Investigate where shoppers struggle to make a suitable purchase. Review product questions, service contacts, return reasons and the journey through search, category and product pages. Connect those observations with the products and customers involved.

Consider a product range where shoppers repeatedly ask about compatibility. The first requirement is reliable compatibility information. Better attributes, filtering or a clearer guide may address the problem. An AI assistant becomes a candidate if interpreting varied questions adds useful help and its answers can be checked against authoritative product information.

Measure suitable purchases and the experience after delivery. A recommendation that avoids an unsuitable order may be valuable even when it does not improve the immediate conversion rate. Agree how that trade-off will be assessed.

Keep stock status, delivery promises and product claims tied to maintained sources. Someone must own those sources and decide what the customer sees when information is missing or ambiguous.

Improve the trading decision, then consider the assistant

Identify a recurring decision where the team struggles to assemble or interpret the evidence. This could be choosing which category needs attention, investigating a change in returns or deciding whether a promotion should continue.

In an illustrative merchandising review, sales might be growing while contribution weakens. Before recommending more promotion, investigate discount depth, product mix, availability, fulfilment costs and returns. A useful AI-assisted workflow could organise the evidence and prepare questions for the merchandiser to investigate.

Keep calculations reproducible in the reporting or analytical tools that supply the figures. Require a route from a written observation back to the relevant data. The trading owner needs to distinguish a supported finding from a possible explanation.

Define authority separately from analysis. Preparing a proposed assortment or promotion change does not automatically grant a system permission to change prices, spend a budget or publish an offer.

Include operations in the opportunity assessment

Bring service and fulfilment teams into the discussion before selecting a customer-facing improvement. They can identify where a proposed experience changes workload, commitments or exception handling.

For an illustrative order-status process, a clearer notification and an existing order-tracking feature might answer the customer’s question. Where requests require interpretation across several sources, an assistant could prepare a response for review. Test whether it resolves the enquiry accurately and whether customers need to contact the team again.

Check existing platform capabilities before commissioning another layer of technology. The AI or automation decision should include configuration, process changes and the capacity to maintain each option.

Run an experiment that supports a commercial decision

Choose a defined area with enough activity to evaluate and an owner able to act on the result. State the proposed improvement, the comparison and the conditions for continuing before the trial begins.

Use a comparable control where practical. Otherwise document the limitations of the comparison and account for promotions, availability, seasonality and changes in customer or product mix. Avoid attributing every movement during the trial to the AI intervention.

For a product-guidance experiment, assess:

  • Whether customers can make the intended decision with accurate information.
  • Contribution from the affected orders, using the agreed cost treatment.
  • Returns, cancellations, service contacts and repeat contacts.
  • Preparation, review, correction and ongoing support effort.

Allow time for relevant post-purchase outcomes to become visible. Keep early indicators separate from a completed assessment. Agree what level of uncertainty is acceptable and when the evidence supports extending, changing or stopping the approach.

Give the outcome a commercial owner

An ecommerce initiative needs someone accountable for the trading or customer outcome, alongside responsibility for technology, information and daily operation. Include the people whose work changes, and give reviewers the time and authority to question an output.

Sequence opportunities around value and readiness. Correcting product information or settling ownership may be the necessary first investment. Practical AI governance helps define the decisions, permissions and review arrangements needed to carry the work forward.

My AI strategy and commercial decision work connects these choices with implementation, governance and the changes teams need to make.

About the author

James Mark Lewis

James works across AI strategy, implementation, governance and change management. He brings 15 years across digital and technology to decisions about commercial value, delivery and people.

More about James

Your next step

Put the advice in context.

If this is a decision your business is working through, tell me about the situation and where you need help.

Request an intro call